Mr. D's Notes on James
Introduction
Rev. Stanley L. Derickson Ph.D.
Copyright 2006
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a
retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic,
mechanical, photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of
the author, except as provided by U.S.A. copyright laws. Do feel free to make
copies for friends that might be interested as long as you do not make profit
from the copies. This is God's work and I don't want anyone to profit from it in
a material way.
Links to the studies and downloading of the studies are toward the bottom of the
page.
AUTHOR:
There are a couple of theories relating to the person of James.
One suggests that there are two men named James. James the brother of John, and
James the Less. James the Less is suggested to be the half-brother of Christ,
but the word used can extend to a cousin as well as a brother.
Others suggest three men named James. James the brother of John, James the Less,
and James the brother of Christ.
James the brother of John:
a. Brother of John Mark 3.17
b. Son of Zebedee Mark 3.17
c. Killed by Herod Acts 12.1-2
d. Fisherman
e. An apostle
James the Less:
a. This man is identified as Clophas and Alphaeus, which are both taken from the
same Hebrew word and seem to be the same man.
b. Mark. 15.40 and John 19.25 in the same context show Mary as the mother of
James the Less, and the wife of Clopas.
c. He is also mentioned as brother of Joses and Salome in Mark 3.18.
d. This is not Christ's brother for their mothers are both listed in John 19.25.
e. He is last mentioned in Acts 1.13.
James, Christ's half-brother:
a. Christ's half-brother is mentioned in Gal. 1.19 and Matt. 13.55 and he may
have had other brothers and sisters Mark 6.3; Psalm 69.8 (John 2.13-17 shows Ps.
69.8 as being Messianic.)
b. See Matt. 12.46-50 and Matt. 13.55.
c. He was a pillar of the church Gal. 2.9.
d. He was important in the church at Jerusalem. Acts 15.13 mentions him as one
of the leaders at the Council in Jerusalem.
e. A James was martyred in 62 A.D. Josephus says "And bringing before them
James, the brother of him who is called Christ, and some others, he accused them
as transgressor of the law, and had them stoned to death." James Belief in
Action; Correspondence School; Moody Press; Chicago; 1962.
Hegeippus, an historian, relates some of the details of his death.
The Scribes and Pharisees, after placing James in a pinnacle of the temple,
begged him to restrain the people, as large numbers were embracing
Christianity." They asked him what door Christ would enter when He returned and
He replied "Why ask ye me concerning Jesus the Son of Man? He sitteth at the
right hand of power and will come again on the clouds of heaven: Many of his
hearers then cried: Hosanna to the Son of David. This so infuriated the
Pharisees that they threw him down headlong; then stoned him and beat him to
death with a fullers club." James Faith in Action; G. Coleman Luck; pp. 12,13;
Moody Press; Chicago; 1954.
Barnes Notes mentions: "He is described by Jewish historians of that day as a
man eminent for his integrity of life, and as well meriting the applelation or
surname which he bore among the Jews, of the Just. He is mentioned as one who
set himself against the corruptions of the age, and who was thence termed the
bulwark of the people. His manner of life is represented as strict and holy, and
such as to command in an eminent degree the confidence of his countrymen, the
Jews. He frequently prostrated himself on his knees in the temple, calling on
God to forgive the sins of his people, praying that the divine judgments on the
unbelievers might be averted, and that they might be led to repentance and
faith, and thus to a participation of the kingdom of the glorified Messiah."
So, who was the author? There seems to be some confusion. Constable suggests
that he was just a man at Jerusalem, not the James of the Gospels, not one of
the twelve.
Most I've read view this writer as the apostle and the half-brother of Christ.
Several make comment that just because he doesn't identify himself as an apostle
does not mean he wasn't one.
A little about the author would be of interest. If we have the correct James, he
was also brother to the Jude that wrote the epistle. Both introduce themselves
as a servant of God in their books. Jude tells of his brother relationship to
James in verse one of his epistle.
We don't know when he became a believer, but he was a believer shortly after the
resurrection. Paul mentions in the context of Christ appearing to believers,
that he appeared to James then to all of the apostles, thus also indicating that
this James was the apostle James I Cor. 15.5-8. Note however, that there were
two men named James that were apostles (Matt. 10.1-4).
It may be of note that James, an apostle, and the half-brother of Christ, does
not call to either of these credentials to gain the readers attention. This
might suggest that he knew his recipients quite well and knew that they knew who
and what he was. This would enforce the theory that the recipients were from the
Day of Pentecost or Acts eight.
Eusebius mentions that he lived as a Nazarite in the Old Testament fashion of
Numbers 6.1-21. He also mentions that he was a prayer warrior of some great
degree.
DATE: Since it seems that the James that was martyred wrote the letter, and
since that James died in 62 A.D., it would seem that it was written prior to
that date. Some suggest that James does not mention the Jerusalem council in 49
A.D. thus it must have been earlier than that, however there is no requirement
for a writer to give a history lesson in a letter relating to other subjects, so
this idea has little support.
RECIPIENTS:
Many suggest that it was to those Northwest of Israel between Israel and Greece,
as does Jamison, Fausset and Brown, "Peter addresses the dispersed Jews of
Pontus, Galatia, and Cappadocia; James, the Israelites of the twelve tribes
scattered abroad”
Acts 2.8-11 tells of the day of Pentecost when Jews from all over the world
gathered and heard Peter preach. Many were saved that day and went off across
the world spreading the good news.
Some suggest that the letter was to twelve locations, but the text says tribes
so I'm not sure what that is based on.
There is also the possibility that the letter was going out to people known to
the apostle from the church in Jerusalem. In Acts eight we are told of the
scattering of the church, thus he may have been trying to encourage and teach
those that he knew.
Either of the Acts accounts could be the basis for the letter, and I think I
would lean toward the latter in that the occasion to write would be stronger if
the RECIPIENTS were to be people James knew personally.
Just a side note, no matter whom James was writing to, he introduces us to the
thought of TWELVE tribes. Many have taught in the past that the ten northern
tribes of Israel were lost into the masses of humanity, but James would differ
with that teaching - he viewed the twelve tribes as existing in some manner in
his time. A reading of Revelation seven will also show that the twelve tribes
are a reality.
These are sometimes called the diaspora which comes from the Greek word used
here. It relates to people living outside of Israel. I am a part of the Nebraska
diaspora for I was born and raised in Nebraska, but am now one of the thousands
that left Nebraska to dwell elsewhere.
This term is used of the scattering of the Old Testament Jews as well (Those
that were taken captive after the fall of Israel.). It is properly used also of
those Jews today living outside of Israel. They are scattered among the nations
until God regathers then in the end time.
Barnes points out that there were two dispersions, one under the Babylonians to
the east and one under Alexander the Great to the west. He also mentions that
some suggest that James was writing to these Jews that were taken to the east,
that it is a Jewish letter. I rather doubt, as does Barnes, that he would have
introduced a letter to Jews that hated Christ as one coming from a servant of
Christ. The Babylonian captivity was many years earlier and those people would
have had little interest in Christ, if indeed, they had even heard of Him in
their place of residence.
PURPOSE:
James was eminently qualified to write this book. He was a Jew saved by grace
and highly respected among his peers.
James is a book that is close to works. It is the "show leather for your
Christian walk," it is shoes for your faith. It will challenge your Christian
couch potato syndrome quite heavily.
It was a battle cry to the despersion to raise above the ways of the world and
to set their spiritual life in order and get to work for their Lord.
Matthew Henry mentions of the book, “This epistle of James is one of the most
instructive writings in the New Testament. Being chiefly directed against
particular errors at that time brought in among the Jewish Christians, it does
not contain the same full doctrinal statements as the other epistles, but it
presents an admirable summary of the practical duties of all believers."
We might mention that these Jewish Christians that were introducing error may
have been doing it quite innocently. If, as we have surmised these are believers
from Pentecost, and if they did leave fairly soon after the event was over, then
they were leaving with little if any discipleship. Even if they had been at the
church at Jerusalem and were the scattered of Acts eight, they would not have
been fully discipled and grounded in the Word.
They would have understood all that they had heard in light of their Jewishness
and would naturally have not had the revelation that the apostles had from the
Lord. Error was sure to creep in with this setting.
I once heard a translator state that they never gave the gospel while with a
tribe translating; they just did their work and left without teaching them
anything. The Indians were left with a Bible in their own language and that the
Spirit would lead them.
What utter foolishness. Yes, the Spirit will lead them - if and when they get
saved. Yes, the Spirit will lead them - if they happen to study the Spirit in
the Word first and find out what is going on in their spiritual side - that they
have never been in touch with.
The great commission tells us to disciple, not leave them to their own devices!
A possible application to this is that we ought to be sure we disciple those
that we have opportunity to reach before they go out into the world. A further
application might be that we are patient with those that are untaught in the
Word. They may misspeak, but there is no need to pound them into the ground for
their error - correct them in Christian love.
I have seen, many times, on the internet forums people that love to crush
misstatements of others - usually people that are untaught. People that are
there to learn, and speak of things they don't understand, and rather than take
it as an opportunity to disciple, some take the opportunity to grind them into
the dust beneath their feet, showing them to be the ignorant idiot that they
think them to be.
OVERVIEW:
The book is full of commands (there we go, lots of do's and don'ts for people to
make fun of - but these are God's not some man's so this is NOT legalism)
There is a strong Jewish flavor to the book, many references to Old Testament
books and people. A writer that is well versed in Judaism and its rich
tradition.
There is also a strong emphasis on the Sermon on the Mount. Constable suggests
some areas that James mentions Matt.5.20, 5.48, 6.1.
Mr. Unger has a good passage on the book that I would like to share at this
point. "After a brief greeting he exhorts his readers to take the proper
attitude toward testing and trials and warns them to react properly toward the
Word of God. He rebukes a demonstration of carnal partiality. He expounds the
uselessness of faith apart from works. He inveighs against the sin of an
uncontrolled tongue. He expounds true and false wisdom. He advises them against
quarrelsomeness, worldliness and pride. He inculcates brotherly consideration.
He criticizes the spirit of their business activity. He calls them to patient
endurance of life’s misfortunes. He shows them what to do when afflicted and he
stresses the need for restoring a person who has gone astray." Unger’s Bible
Dictionary
Consider that "to ralley Christians from worldliness to the Privileges of their
faith." What a book for our day and age in Christian society in the 2000s!
APPLICATION:
1. It crossed my mind that there was some import to the first writers of the New
Testament times. They had the Old Testament or had heard its teachings, I don't
know how prolific copies were at this time, but the apostles must have felt it
important to get some of this information down for future generations. Those
first writers, whom I believe to have been James and Mark, took that first step
to set their remembrances down for others to read.
I have also wondered if hearing of their writings might have prompted some of
the others to set to work on their own accounts.
Paul's letters were mostly just written for the edification of the local
churches involved, but all the books contain valuable information for the
believer. They all saw the need for the information to be given to others - it
wasn't just for their own personal benefit.
The whole concept of discipleship in the great commission is the passing on of
information. Paul had it right when he penned II Timothy 2.2 "And the things
that thou hast heard of me among many witnesses, the same commit thou to
faithful men, who shall be able to teach others also."
We are to be in the business of passing on what we have in the spiritual realm.
We ought not to keep a lid on it; we should take off the lid and teach others so
that they can teach others. This cycle is critical to the church continuing to
exist.
I do not endorse the "tradition" of the Roman church, but they certainly have it
right in the idea of passing on their teaching to future generations. The
writings since the canon was closed are not inspired, but they can be very
valuable to the believer, even today.
Recently I discovered that my mother lived, for a time, in a town about two
hundred miles from her hometown. I have no idea why she was there. My parents
did not pass on the family stories and thus there are many blank spots in my
knowledge of my own family. I don't know if my children will be interested in
the family history, but they will certainly have it, since I have set it to the
computer.
I would further guess these men had no idea that their writings would ever be
set into a canon of Scripture for the use of the church.
The final thought might run along the lines that if God leads you to do
something for Him, be sure to do it; you have no idea what He might decide to do
with it in the future.
2. We have in James a standard, a standard to be met, not observed, considered
and rejected as too difficult.
I was having chest pains so went to the emergency room for a quick check. They
could find nothing wrong but before they let me go home I had a minor heart
attach on the table. They rushed me into a procedure to correct the problem and
I rested in the hospital for a couple days.
I tell you this because I would like to illustrate how some Christians might
view James.
My cardiologist came in for his first visit. Now, remember, the prescribed
action to avoid another heart attack is a low fat, low salt, low sugar diet to
get the weight off and lower the cholesterol. Okay, with that background, my
cardiologist showed up for his first visit -- He was about the heaviest doctor I
have ever seen, and he was chewing delightfully on a chocolate he had picked up
at the nurses station.
In my mind, I had to wonder about the common sense this man was lacking -
dealing with heart attacks, and plugged arteries all day and allowing himself to
be so overweight and eating all the wrong things. He certainly was not setting
an example that my wife wanted me to follow to assure long life.
James sets a standard before us, and it is a standard to be adopted, not
considered.
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
1. James Belief in Action; Correspondence School; Moody Press; Chicago; 1962.
2. Stick Out Your Faith and Say AAH; James T. Dyet; Baptist Press; Denver ;1975.
3. Leaders Resource Guide; Stick Out Your Faith and Say AAH; James T. Dyet;
Baptist Press; Denver ; 1975.
4. Aldersgate Biblical Series: James and Peter; Light and Life Press; Winona
Lake; Marvin l. Galreath; 1962.
5. James Faith in Action; G. Coleman Luck; Moody Press; Chicago; 1954.
6. Studies in James; Living Word Curriculum T254208; Gospel Light; Glendale;
1972.
7. The Letters of James and Peter; William Barclay; Westminsteer Press;
Philadelphia; no copyright date shown.
8. James Faith that Works; Harold L. Fickett Jr.; Regal; Glendale; 1972.
9. "THE GENERAL EPISTLE OF JAMES by Barnes; from the internet in .txt format
10. Gill's Notes on James; from the internet in .txt format
11. Dr. Constable's Notes on James; from the internet in .pdf format
Chapter One James 1.1-4
Chapter Two James 1.5-8
Chapter Three James 1.9-11
Chapter Four James 1.12-15
Chapter Five James 1.16-20
Chapter Six James 1.21-25
Chapter Seven James 1.26-27
Chapter Eight James 2.1-4
Chapter Nine James 2.5-9
Chapter Ten James 2.10-14
Chapter Eleven James 2. 15-20
Chapter Twelve James 2.21-26
Chapter Thirteen James 3.1-5
Chapter Fourteen James 3.6-13
Chapter fifteen James 3.13-18
Chapter sixteen James 4.1-4
Chapter seventeen James 4.5-10
Chapter eighteen James 4.11-17
Chapter nineteen James 5.1-6
Chapter twenty James 5.7-12
Chapter twenty-one James 5.13-20
Download all text
files